GK SDK 源码库: XMIPCLinuxV100R005C00SPC030 (kernel/tools/open_source excluded)
This commit is contained in:
+168
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 2013-2018, ARM Limited and Contributors. All rights reserved.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#include <assert.h>
|
||||
#include <string.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include <arch_helpers.h>
|
||||
#include <lib/bakery_lock.h>
|
||||
#include <lib/el3_runtime/cpu_data.h>
|
||||
#include <plat/common/platform.h>
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Functions in this file implement Bakery Algorithm for mutual exclusion with the
|
||||
* bakery lock data structures in coherent memory.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ARM architecture offers a family of exclusive access instructions to
|
||||
* efficiently implement mutual exclusion with hardware support. However, as
|
||||
* well as depending on external hardware, the these instructions have defined
|
||||
* behavior only on certain memory types (cacheable and Normal memory in
|
||||
* particular; see ARMv8 Architecture Reference Manual section B2.10). Use cases
|
||||
* in trusted firmware are such that mutual exclusion implementation cannot
|
||||
* expect that accesses to the lock have the specific type required by the
|
||||
* architecture for these primitives to function (for example, not all
|
||||
* contenders may have address translation enabled).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This implementation does not use mutual exclusion primitives. It expects
|
||||
* memory regions where the locks reside to be fully ordered and coherent
|
||||
* (either by disabling address translation, or by assigning proper attributes
|
||||
* when translation is enabled).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note that the ARM architecture guarantees single-copy atomicity for aligned
|
||||
* accesses regardless of status of address translation.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#define assert_bakery_entry_valid(_entry, _bakery) do { \
|
||||
assert((_bakery) != NULL); \
|
||||
assert((_entry) < BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS); \
|
||||
} while (false)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Obtain a ticket for a given CPU */
|
||||
static unsigned int bakery_get_ticket(bakery_lock_t *bakery, unsigned int me)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int my_ticket, their_ticket;
|
||||
unsigned int they;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Prevent recursive acquisition */
|
||||
assert(bakery_ticket_number(bakery->lock_data[me]) == 0U);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Flag that we're busy getting our ticket. All CPUs are iterated in the
|
||||
* order of their ordinal position to decide the maximum ticket value
|
||||
* observed so far. Our priority is set to be greater than the maximum
|
||||
* observed priority
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note that it's possible that more than one contender gets the same
|
||||
* ticket value. That's OK as the lock is acquired based on the priority
|
||||
* value, not the ticket value alone.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
my_ticket = 0U;
|
||||
bakery->lock_data[me] = make_bakery_data(CHOOSING_TICKET, my_ticket);
|
||||
for (they = 0U; they < BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS; they++) {
|
||||
their_ticket = bakery_ticket_number(bakery->lock_data[they]);
|
||||
if (their_ticket > my_ticket)
|
||||
my_ticket = their_ticket;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Compute ticket; then signal to other contenders waiting for us to
|
||||
* finish calculating our ticket value that we're done
|
||||
*/
|
||||
++my_ticket;
|
||||
bakery->lock_data[me] = make_bakery_data(CHOSEN_TICKET, my_ticket);
|
||||
|
||||
return my_ticket;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Acquire bakery lock
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Contending CPUs need first obtain a non-zero ticket and then calculate
|
||||
* priority value. A contending CPU iterate over all other CPUs in the platform,
|
||||
* which may be contending for the same lock, in the order of their ordinal
|
||||
* position (CPU0, CPU1 and so on). A non-contending CPU will have its ticket
|
||||
* (and priority) value as 0. The contending CPU compares its priority with that
|
||||
* of others'. The CPU with the highest priority (lowest numerical value)
|
||||
* acquires the lock
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void bakery_lock_get(bakery_lock_t *bakery)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int they, me;
|
||||
unsigned int my_ticket, my_prio, their_ticket;
|
||||
unsigned int their_bakery_data;
|
||||
|
||||
me = plat_my_core_pos();
|
||||
|
||||
assert_bakery_entry_valid(me, bakery);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Get a ticket */
|
||||
my_ticket = bakery_get_ticket(bakery, me);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Now that we got our ticket, compute our priority value, then compare
|
||||
* with that of others, and proceed to acquire the lock
|
||||
*/
|
||||
my_prio = bakery_get_priority(my_ticket, me);
|
||||
for (they = 0U; they < BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS; they++) {
|
||||
if (me == they)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wait for the contender to get their ticket */
|
||||
do {
|
||||
their_bakery_data = bakery->lock_data[they];
|
||||
} while (bakery_is_choosing(their_bakery_data));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the other party is a contender, they'll have non-zero
|
||||
* (valid) ticket value. If they do, compare priorities
|
||||
*/
|
||||
their_ticket = bakery_ticket_number(their_bakery_data);
|
||||
if ((their_ticket != 0U) &&
|
||||
(bakery_get_priority(their_ticket, they) < my_prio)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* They have higher priority (lower value). Wait for
|
||||
* their ticket value to change (either release the lock
|
||||
* to have it dropped to 0; or drop and probably content
|
||||
* again for the same lock to have an even higher value)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
do {
|
||||
wfe();
|
||||
} while (their_ticket ==
|
||||
bakery_ticket_number(bakery->lock_data[they]));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Lock acquired. Ensure that any reads and writes from a shared
|
||||
* resource in the critical section read/write values after the lock is
|
||||
* acquired.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
dmbish();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* Release the lock and signal contenders */
|
||||
void bakery_lock_release(bakery_lock_t *bakery)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int me = plat_my_core_pos();
|
||||
|
||||
assert_bakery_entry_valid(me, bakery);
|
||||
assert(bakery_ticket_number(bakery->lock_data[me]) != 0U);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ensure that other observers see any stores in the critical section
|
||||
* before releasing the lock. Also ensure all loads in the critical
|
||||
* section are complete before releasing the lock. Release the lock by
|
||||
* resetting ticket. Then signal other waiting contenders.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
dmbish();
|
||||
bakery->lock_data[me] = 0U;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Required to ensure ordering of the following sev */
|
||||
dsb();
|
||||
sev();
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user